wild_animal_suffering
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| wild_animal_suffering [2025/11/15 18:54] – created administrator | wild_animal_suffering [2025/11/15 18:56] (current) – administrator | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| When following discussions about wildlife rescue and rehabilitation, | When following discussions about wildlife rescue and rehabilitation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[cats_cars_and_wildlife|Cats, | ||
| + | * [[top_reasons_to_keep_cats_indoors|Top Reasons to Keep Cats Indoors]] | ||
| ===== Wild Animal Rescue, Rehabilitation and Release ===== | ===== Wild Animal Rescue, Rehabilitation and Release ===== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 48: | ||
| From this viewpoint, releasing animals back into the wild is ethically seen a doubtful way to show compassion and to reduce wild animal suffering. However, so far at least, there are no better alternatives available. But when it comes to releasing animals back into the ‘wild’, then these animals should be at the very least in perfect health. They should never be released prematurely or with, for example, a suboptimal plumage. Sadly, this still happens quite frequently, a move which is often being ‘justified’ with high demands and pressures put onto chronically underfunded wildlife rescues and rehabbers. However, to give these animals truly the chance they deserve, no shortcuts must be taken. Adhering to the highest standards of care is crucial, and only when doing so, lives will be truly saved. | From this viewpoint, releasing animals back into the wild is ethically seen a doubtful way to show compassion and to reduce wild animal suffering. However, so far at least, there are no better alternatives available. But when it comes to releasing animals back into the ‘wild’, then these animals should be at the very least in perfect health. They should never be released prematurely or with, for example, a suboptimal plumage. Sadly, this still happens quite frequently, a move which is often being ‘justified’ with high demands and pressures put onto chronically underfunded wildlife rescues and rehabbers. However, to give these animals truly the chance they deserve, no shortcuts must be taken. Adhering to the highest standards of care is crucial, and only when doing so, lives will be truly saved. | ||
| - | Euthanasia is certainly the first choice when it comes to avoid suffering, but only as long as one bears in mind that the animals concerned are not objects or possessions, | + | Euthanasia is certainly the first choice when it comes to avoid suffering, but only as long as one bears in mind that the animals concerned are not objects or possessions, |
| - | + | ||
| - | Bibliography | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | 1. Animal Ethics, The situation of animals in the wild, http:// | + | |
| - | 2. Offwell Woodland & Wildlife Trust, Ecological Survey & Habitat Restoration Site, Lifespan of Birds, How long does a bird live?, Dr Mike Hounsome, http:// | + | |
| - | 3. Bekoff, Marc, and Jessica Pierce. 2009. Wild justice: the moral lives of animals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | + | |
wild_animal_suffering.1763229294.txt.gz · Last modified: by administrator
