some_thoughts_about_animal_learning_and_imprinting

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
some_thoughts_about_animal_learning_and_imprinting [2025/11/02 15:49] – created administratorsome_thoughts_about_animal_learning_and_imprinting [2025/11/07 13:23] (current) administrator
Line 3: Line 3:
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
  
-Imprinting of rescue bird is an often hotly debated topic amongst bird lovers, wildlife rehabilitators and rescuers, where voiced opinions range considerably. One extreme approach to this topic suggests that imprinted birds are principally unreleasable, and that once a bird is imprinted that this situation cannot be reversed. The other extreme opinion considers all imprinted birds as releasable and implies that these birds have similar survival chances in the wild compared to birds who have not been imprinted. However, own experiences and those of fellow rehabbers have shown that, and this should actually not be unexpected, the truth lies neither in the middle nor is it to find in one or the other extreme. To find an answer, it seems worth to explore some basic underlying processes, like imprinting, learning, conditioning and habituation.+{{ :2016-11-08_1979.jpeg?200|}}Imprinting of rescue bird is an often hotly debated topic amongst bird lovers, wildlife rehabilitators and rescuers, where voiced opinions range considerably. One extreme approach to this topic suggests that imprinted birds are principally unreleasable, and that once a bird is imprinted that this situation cannot be reversed. The other extreme opinion considers all imprinted birds as releasable and implies that these birds have similar survival chances in the wild compared to birds who have not been imprinted. However, own experiences and those of fellow rehabbers have shown that, and this should actually not be unexpected, the truth lies neither in the middle nor is it to find in one or the other extreme. To find an answer, it seems worth to explore some basic underlying processes, like imprinting, learning, conditioning and habituation.
  
 ===== What Is Learning? ===== ===== What Is Learning? =====
Line 11: Line 11:
 ===== Precocial Species And Filial Imprinting ===== ===== Precocial Species And Filial Imprinting =====
  
-Precocial species are those in which the young are relatively mature and mobile from the moment of birth or hatching. The phenomenon of filial imprinting ensures that, in normal circumstances, the precocial infant forms an attachment to its mother and never moves too far away. (1)+Precocial species are those in which the young are relatively mature and mobile from the moment of birth or hatching. The phenomenon of filial imprinting ensures that, in normal circumstances, the precocial infant forms an attachment to its mother and never moves too far away. ((Nicholas John Mackintosh, Animal learning, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 17 November 2015, www.britannica.com/topic/animal-learning/Imprinting, 12 January 2018.))
  
-Konrad Lorenz pointed out for the first time that if imprinting is to occur, the young animal must be exposed to its object during a critical period early in its life. Lorenz found that a young duckling or gosling learns to follow the first conspicuous moving object he or she sees within the first few hours or days after hatching. (2)+Konrad Lorenz pointed out for the first time that if imprinting is to occur, the young animal must be exposed to its object during a critical period early in its life. Lorenz found that a young duckling or gosling learns to follow the first conspicuous moving object he or she sees within the first few hours or days after hatching. ((Lorenz, K. Z. 1935 Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Journal fuer Ornithologie 83:137-213, 289-413.))
  
-Imprinting, so it has been suggested, was different from most forms of learning. It appeared irreversible and confined to a critical period, and seemed not to require reinforcement or a reward. However, later research suggested that imprinting may in fact be reversible and may also extend beyond the critical period originally identified by Lorenz and Hess. (3)+Imprinting, so it has been suggested, was different from most forms of learning. It appeared irreversible and confined to a critical period, and seemed not to require reinforcement or a reward. However, later research suggested that imprinting may in fact be reversible and may also extend beyond the critical period originally identified by Lorenz and Hess. ((Cathy Faye, Time Capsule, Lessons from bird brains, Eckhard Hess’s research on imprinting helped to popularize an emerging field of research—one that that explored genetic and learned aspects of early behavior. December 2011, vol 42, no. 11, page 30.)
  
 ===== Altricial Species And Imprinting ===== ===== Altricial Species And Imprinting =====
  
-Altricial young are born helpless and require care for a specific amount of time. Among birds, these include herons, hawks, woodpeckers, owls, cuckoos and most passerines including corvids. Altricial species differ from precocial species in that they lack this immediate filial imprinting. Since altricial birds hatch blind, their only immediate sensory input for possible imprinting is aural or tactile. (4)+Altricial young are born helpless and require care for a specific amount of time. Among birds, these include herons, hawks, woodpeckers, owls, cuckoos and most passerines including corvids. Altricial species differ from precocial species in that they lack this immediate filial imprinting. Since altricial birds hatch blind, their only immediate sensory input for possible imprinting is aural or tactile. ((Dan Gleason, Dan Gleason’s Blog, Imprinting in birds, 2010, www.dangleason.wordpress.com/avian-biology/172-2/, 12 January 2018.))
  
 As all corvideae species are altricial, filial imprinting does not play a significant role, because these birds hatch with closed eyes, which they usually open at around ten days of age.  However,  when birds are raised by their own, without companions of their own kind, and humans are the only role model and source of food and protection, then these hand raised birds will imprint on the human for species recognition and partner choice when maturing. Aural imprinting seems to be also a special case of perceptional or observational learning, where young birds are acquiring their species-typical song and vocalisations. Songbirds for example learn to vocalise within the first eight weeks of their lives, which is a crucial development step for their future. As all corvideae species are altricial, filial imprinting does not play a significant role, because these birds hatch with closed eyes, which they usually open at around ten days of age.  However,  when birds are raised by their own, without companions of their own kind, and humans are the only role model and source of food and protection, then these hand raised birds will imprint on the human for species recognition and partner choice when maturing. Aural imprinting seems to be also a special case of perceptional or observational learning, where young birds are acquiring their species-typical song and vocalisations. Songbirds for example learn to vocalise within the first eight weeks of their lives, which is a crucial development step for their future.
Line 25: Line 25:
 ===== What Is Habituation? ===== ===== What Is Habituation? =====
  
-Habituation is a form of non-associative learning, in which an animal, after a period of exposure to a stimulus, stops responding. Habituation usually refers to a reduction in innate behaviours, rather than behaviours acquired during conditioning. The habituation process is a form of adaptive behaviour or neuroplasticity. It can occur at different levels in the nervous system, as for example the sensory systems may stop, after a while, sending signals to the brain in response to a continuously present or often-repeated stimulus. (5)+Habituation is a form of non-associative learning, in which an animal, after a period of exposure to a stimulus, stops responding. Habituation usually refers to a reduction in innate behaviours, rather than behaviours acquired during conditioning. The habituation process is a form of adaptive behaviour or neuroplasticity. It can occur at different levels in the nervous system, as for example the sensory systems may stop, after a while, sending signals to the brain in response to a continuously present or often-repeated stimulus. ((Cohen TE, Kaplan SW, Kandel ER, Hawkins RD 1997 A simplified preparation for relating cellular events to behavior: Mechanisms contributing to habituation, dishabituation, and sensitization of the Aplysia gill-withdrawal reflex, Journal of Neuroscience 17 (8): 2886-2899.))
  
 Habituation is crucial in filtering the large amounts of information received from the surrounding environment. It helps to distinguish important from seemingly unimportant pieces of information. A good example is the use of alarm calls to convey information about predators. Habituated animals will stop giving alarm calls, when they become familiar with another species, for example humans, who have fed, raised or helped them. Habituation is crucial in filtering the large amounts of information received from the surrounding environment. It helps to distinguish important from seemingly unimportant pieces of information. A good example is the use of alarm calls to convey information about predators. Habituated animals will stop giving alarm calls, when they become familiar with another species, for example humans, who have fed, raised or helped them.
Line 31: Line 31:
 ===== And What Does This All Mean When Rescuing Corvids? ===== ===== And What Does This All Mean When Rescuing Corvids? =====
  
-It means that the typical filial imprinting, as it happens with precocial birds, is not that much of a problem for altricial birds like corvids. However, it still means that in a rehabilitation setting, there is a big risk that songbirds are missing the crucial step of acquisition of their species-typical song and vocalisations. When this development step is being missed, then these birds are unlikely to gain a territory, to attract a mate or to find their place in their respective bird society and hierarchy. (6)+It means that the typical filial imprinting, as it happens with precocial birds, is not that much of a problem for altricial birds like corvids. However, it still means that in a rehabilitation setting, there is a big risk that songbirds are missing the crucial step of acquisition of their species-typical song and vocalisations. When this development step is being missed, then these birds are unlikely to gain a territory, to attract a mate or to find their place in their respective bird society and hierarchy. ((Melissa B. Dolinsky, Department of Biology, University of Miami, Missing a crucial step? Presented at the International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council Conference in Portland,Oregon, www.starlingtalk.com/BirdSong.htm, 12 January 2018.)
  
 This is in particular the case when rescue birds are raised by their own, without contact to mature resident or wild birds of their own species. Same species surrogate parents would be the ideal solution, or the use of mixed age same species rescue bird groups, which ideally should include mature birds. This subject definitely makes a good argument for keeping non-releasable songbirds in order to use them as tutors. Alternatively, song recordings have been successfully used in combination with ‘stuffed animals’, in particular in situations, where no companion bird has been available. Resident foster or surrogate birds play also a crucial role, when it comes to avoid potential problems related to species recognition and sexual imprinting. This is in particular the case when rescue birds are raised by their own, without contact to mature resident or wild birds of their own species. Same species surrogate parents would be the ideal solution, or the use of mixed age same species rescue bird groups, which ideally should include mature birds. This subject definitely makes a good argument for keeping non-releasable songbirds in order to use them as tutors. Alternatively, song recordings have been successfully used in combination with ‘stuffed animals’, in particular in situations, where no companion bird has been available. Resident foster or surrogate birds play also a crucial role, when it comes to avoid potential problems related to species recognition and sexual imprinting.
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 Many cases of so called imprinting can be addressed and treated. The success rate varies and depends on many factors, as outlined above. However, it would be wrong to assume that imprinting is simply reversible, as it doesn’t take in account the ability to learn, adaptability, individuality and intelligence of our bird patients. Considering the amazing plasticity of the brain, it is more likely that imprinted patterns become rather suppressed by newly learned behaviour and knowledge, than genuinely reversed. Many cases of so called imprinting can be addressed and treated. The success rate varies and depends on many factors, as outlined above. However, it would be wrong to assume that imprinting is simply reversible, as it doesn’t take in account the ability to learn, adaptability, individuality and intelligence of our bird patients. Considering the amazing plasticity of the brain, it is more likely that imprinted patterns become rather suppressed by newly learned behaviour and knowledge, than genuinely reversed.
- 
-Bibliography 
- 
-1. Nicholas John Mackintosh, Animal learning, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 17 November 2015, www.britannica.com/topic/animal-learning/Imprinting, 12 January 2018 
-2. Lorenz, K. Z. 1935 Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Journal fuer Ornithologie 83:137-213, 289-413  
-3. Cathy Faye, Time Capsule, Lessons from bird brains, Eckhard Hess’s research on imprinting helped to popularize an emerging field of research—one that that explored genetic and learned aspects of early behavior. December 2011, vol 42, no. 11, page 30.  
-4. Dan Gleason, Dan Gleason’s Blog, Imprinting in birds, 2010, www.dangleason.wordpress.com/avian-biology/172-2/, 12 January 2018  
-5. Cohen TE, Kaplan SW, Kandel ER, Hawkins RD 1997 A simplified preparation for relating cellular events to behavior: Mechanisms contributing to habituation, dishabituation, and sensitization of the Aplysia gill-withdrawal reflex, Journal of Neuroscience 17 (8): 2886-2899  
-6. Melissa B. Dolinsky, Department of Biology, University of Miami, Missing a crucial step? Presented at the International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council Conference in Portland,Oregon, www.starlingtalk.com/BirdSong.htm, 12 January 2018  
some_thoughts_about_animal_learning_and_imprinting.1762094953.txt.gz · Last modified: by administrator