corvids_-_killers_or_scavengers
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| corvids_-_killers_or_scavengers [2025/11/16 18:25] – administrator | corvids_-_killers_or_scavengers [2025/11/16 18:32] (current) – administrator | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
| - | Are corvids cold blooded killers or merely opportunistic scavengers? This is the question we are trying to answer in this blog post. Mainstream media and advertising businesses often have a tendency to present an idyllic and idealised version of farming practices, showcasing for example animals living in picturesque environments. This imagery is employed to evoke positive emotions and create a connection with consumers. It is nothing else than a marketing strategy aimed at promoting the products derived from the use of non-human animals, such as meat or wool, by associating them with positive and wholesome images. Humans have a natural inclination to connect with and appreciate the beauty of animals. The sight of a playful and adorable lamb triggers positive emotions, such as joy and warmth, which does evoke empathy and a sense of compassion. | + | {{ : |
| Bearing this in mind, then it is not surprising that the sight of corvids scavenging on such an innocent being will without a doubt be repulsive for most people, who will immediately sympathise with the victim, and not with the scavenger. Unfortunately, | Bearing this in mind, then it is not surprising that the sight of corvids scavenging on such an innocent being will without a doubt be repulsive for most people, who will immediately sympathise with the victim, and not with the scavenger. Unfortunately, | ||
| Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
| Media outlets often have business relationships with various industries, including the agricultural and food industries. These relationships shape the narrative and content that is promoted. As the livestock industry plays a significant role in the economy, media organisations are influenced by the interests of these industries and often choose not to cover processes that may raise ethical or environmental concerns. Also, media outlets often aim to appeal to their target audience and consider what content is likely to resonate with them. | Media outlets often have business relationships with various industries, including the agricultural and food industries. These relationships shape the narrative and content that is promoted. As the livestock industry plays a significant role in the economy, media organisations are influenced by the interests of these industries and often choose not to cover processes that may raise ethical or environmental concerns. Also, media outlets often aim to appeal to their target audience and consider what content is likely to resonate with them. | ||
| - | Scapegoating is often being used to distract from the reality of intensive agricultural farming practices, and their side effects, such as high lamb mortality. However, corvids are not the only ones, as other species such as badgers, foxes and birds or prey are equally blamed and misrepresented. | + | Scapegoating is often being used to distract from the reality of intensive agricultural farming practices, and their side effects, such as high lamb mortality. However, corvids are not the only ones, as other species such as badgers, foxes and birds or prey are equally blamed and misrepresented. ((Scottish Badgers, Badger and Lamb / Sheep Interaction Evidence Sheet, January 2023, https:// |
| - | Existing conflicts between farmers and conservationists regarding the management | + | |
| - | Bibliography | + | Existing conflicts between farmers |
| - | + | ||
| - | 1. Tribe of Heart, https:// | + | |
| - | 2. Wolves, Crows, and Spiders: An eclectic Literature Review inspires a Model explaining Humans’ similar Reactions to ecologically different Wildlife. Front. Environ. Sci. 9:593501. doi: 10.3389/ | + | |
| - | 3. Preventive Veterinary Medicine Volume 52, Issues 3–4, 22 January 2002, Pages 287-303 | + | |
| - | 4. Neonatal lamb mortality: major risk factors | + | |
| - | 5. Purser, A., & Young, G. (1964). Mortality among twin and single lambs. Animal Production, 6(3), 321-329. doi: | + | |
| - | 6. Gunn, R., & Robinson, J. (1963). Lamb mortality in Scottish hill flocks. Animal Production, 5(1), 67-76. doi: | + | |
| - | 7. Houston, David. “The Effect of Hooded Crows on Hill Sheep Farming in Argyll, Scotland: Hooded Crow Damage | + | |
| - | 8. Brehme, A., Wallschläger, | + | |
| - | 9. Hennig, V. (2018). Untersuchung zur Problematik der Kolkraben in der Schafhaltung – untersuchung im Auftrag des Ministeriums für Ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz (2014–2016) bzw. des Ministeriums für Umwelt, Klima und Energiewirtschaft (2016–2017) in Baden- Württemberg; | + | |
| - | 10. Dwyer, C. M., Conington, J., Corbiere, F., Holmøy, I. H., Muri, K., Nowak, R., et al. (2016). Invited review: improving neonatal survival in small ruminants: science into practice. Animal 10 (3), 449–459. doi: | + | |
| - | 11. “The Effect of Hooded Crows on Hill Sheep Farming in Argyll, Scotland: Hooded Crow Damage to Hill Sheep.” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 14, no. 1, 1977, pp. 17–29. JSTOR, https:// | + | |
| - | 12. Coˆté, I. M., and Sutherland, W. J. (1997). The effectiveness of Removing predators | + | |
| - | 13. Madden, C. F., Arroyo, B., and Amar, A. (2015). A review of the impacts | + | |
| - | 14. Lachmann, L., and Arnold, K. (2019). 15 Jahre Vogelzählung und Citizen Science im NABU – Ergebnisse der “Stunde der Gartenvögel” und der “Stunde der Wintervögel”. Berlin, Germany: NABU-Bundesverband. | + | |
| - | 15. The widespread declines | + | |
| - | 16. Owens, I.P.F., Bennett, P.M. (2000) Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: Habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. PNAS. 97(22): 12144-12148 | + | |
| - | 17. Peach, W.J., Ratcliffe, N., Smith, K.W., Summers, R.W., Walton, P., Wilson, J.D. (2007) The predation of wild birds in the UK: a review of its conservation impact and management. RSPB Research Report no 23. RSPB, Sandy. | + | |
| - | 18. Pirie, T.J., Thomas, R.L., Fellowes, M.D.E. (2022) Pet cats (Felis catus) from urban boundaries use different habitats, have larger home ranges and kill more prey than cats from the suburbs. Landscape and Urban Planning. 220: https:// | + | |
| - | 19. Roos, S., Smart, J., Gibbons, D.W., Wilson, J.D. (2018) A review of predation as a limiting factor | + | |
| - | 20. Woods, M., McDonald, R.A., Harris, S. (2003) Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review. 33: 174– 188. | + | |
| - | 21. Gerber, R. (1956). Die Saatkrähe. Die neue Brehm-Bücherei vol 181. Wittenberg, Germany: Ziemsen. | + | |
| - | 22. Veh, M. (1981). Überwinternde Saatkrähen in Nordbaden – Konflikt zwischen Naturschutz und Landwirtschaft und Vorschläge zu einer Lösung. Heidelberg, Germany: Dissertation University. | + | |
| - | 23. Weir, A. A., Chappell, J., and Kacelnik, A. (2002). Shaping of hooks in new caledonian crows. Science 297, 981. doi: | + | |
| - | 24. Clayton, N. S., Dally, J. M., and Emery, N. J. (2007). Social cognition by food- caching corvids. The western scrub-jay as a natural psychologist. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 507–522. doi: | + | |
| - | 25. Clayton, N. S., and Dickinson, A. (1998). Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395, 272–274. doi: | + | |
| - | 26. Raby, C. R., Alexis, D. M., Dickinson, A., and Clayton, N. S. (2007). Planning | + | |
| - | 27. Massen, J. J., Ritter, C., and Bugnyar, T. (2015). Tolerance and reward equity predict cooperation in ravens | + | |
| - | 28. Ditz, H. M., and Nieder, A. (2015). Neurons selective to the number of visual items in the corvid songbird endbrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7827. doi: | + | |
| - | 29. Stahler, D., Heinrich, B., and Smith, D. (2002). Common ravens, Corvus corax, preferentially associate with grey wolves, Canis lupus, as a foraging strategy in winter. Anim. Behav. 64 (2), 283–290. doi: | + | |
| - | 30. Heinrich, B. (2014). Ravens in winter. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. | + | |
| - | 31. Krüger, T., and Nipkow, M. (2015). Die Saatkrähe Corvus Frugilegus als Brutvogel in Niedersachsen – Vorkommen, Schutz, Konflikte und Lösungsmöglichkeiten vol 35. in Jahrgang, nummer, 1. Hannover, Germany: Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen. | + | |
| - | 32. Despret, V. (2015). The enigma of the raven. Angelaki 20, 57–72. doi: | + | |
| - | 33. Scottish Badgers, Badger and Lamb / Sheep Interaction Evidence Sheet, January 2023, https:// | + | |
| - | 34. Investigation into golden eagle predation of lambs on Benbecula in 2003, Steve Campbell and Gill Hartley, Scottish Agricultural Science Agency 2004. | + | |
| - | 35. Scottish National Heritage, Commissioned Report No. 370, Is lamb survival in the Scottish Uplands related to the presence of breeding white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) as well as other livestock predators and environmental variables? A pilot study into sea eagle predation on lambs in the Gairloch area. https:// | + | |
| - | 36. Houston, David. “The Effect of Hooded Crows on Hill Sheep Farming in Argyll, Scotland: Hooded Crow Damage to Hill Sheep.” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 14, no. 1, 1977, pp. 17–29. JSTOR, https:// | + | |
| - | 37. Owens, I.P.F., Bennett, P.M. (2000) Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: Habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. PNAS. 97(22): 12144-12148 | + | |
| - | 38. Pirie, T.J., Thomas, R.L., Fellowes, M.D.E. (2022) Pet cats (Felis catus) from urban boundaries use different habitats, have larger home ranges and kill more prey than cats from the suburbs. Landscape and Urban Planning. 220: https:// | + | |
| - | 39. Roos, S., Smart, J., Gibbons, D.W., Wilson, J.D. (2018) A review of predation as a limiting factor for bird populations in mesopredator-rich landscapes: a case study of the UK. Biological Reviews. 93(4): 1915-1937. | + | |
| - | 40. Woods, M., McDonald, R.A., Harris, S. (2003) Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review. 33: 174– 188. | + | |
| - | + | ||
corvids_-_killers_or_scavengers.1763313923.txt.gz · Last modified: by administrator
